I struggle to see what the purpose of this is...unless the management are setting the stage for a take over bid in which case they will need Trinity support. With DRG now owning 16% of Trinity and the management presumably owning some Trinity shares, they might actually have over 50% ownership of Trinity.
And lets face it, we got it for a steal. If you assume Trinity has nothing but a 25% interest in DRG's tenements and a 16% stake cost $30K, then DRG values their own tenements at $750K ($30K/0.16 x 4). Pretty silly given they paid $8Mill for them. Having said that, we are below cash backing to the market values them as worthless.
Remember we gave Trinity 25% when we paid $8Mill. That's a value of $2Mill. Now we could buy Trinity for $187,500 ($30K/.16) based on the current transaction.
Consider this transaction as a discounted buy back.
is it a good idea to buy 16% of trinity , page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BGL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.30 |
Change
-0.018(1.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.663B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.30 | $1.32 | $1.28 | $6.609M | 5.101M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | 40078 | $1.30 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.31 | 72199 | 37 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.01pm 13/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BGL (ASX) Chart |