Hi Kaala,
1) I find it hard to believe that on drilling hole after hole to ~ 4m & getting barely a sniff of the then expected high U values in the then believed rich surface deposit - with hole by hole assessment with a scintillometer to hand 'dashing' the 'surface deposit' theory, then wouldn't you drill some deeper holes with the rig on site?
2) 18 months back it was reported that the U values at hole bottoms 'belled out' with depth ..... what depth?
3) the comment in today's quarterly re expected U deposit at or below 50m .... how is it known that there's nothing above 50m? I would have thought the water table isn't that deep.
Col8
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.7¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.56%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.38M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.8¢ | 1.8¢ | 1.7¢ | $1.555K | 88.93K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 212984 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8¢ | 357095 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.04pm 08/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MLS (ASX) Chart |