I slam is more of an ideology than a religion these days, and their actions are ideologically driven. That's what I'm opposed to.
When France banned headscarves there was an outcry because it was 'racist' or 'anti religion'. Wrong. It was one ideology (La Republique) vs. another. Why should a religious ideology be more valid than any other kind?
- Forums
- General
- terrorists not muslims
terrorists not muslims, page-29
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)