NWF nz windfarms limited

Ann: FLLYR: NWF: Preliminary Full Year Results to

  1. lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    • Release Date: 29/08/13 19:04
    • Summary: FLLYR: NWF: Preliminary Full Year Results to 30 June 2013
    • Price Sensitive: No
    • Download Document  12.3KB
    					
    
    NWF
    29/08/2013 17:04
    FLLYR
    
    REL: 1704 HRS NZ Windfarms Limited
    
    FLLYR: NWF: Preliminary Full Year Results to 30 June 2013
    
    CHAIRMAN'S REVIEW
    
    INTRODUCTION
    
    Financial year 2013 (FY2013) sees us complete two years of a fully operating
    wind farm with all 97 turbines in place and a generating capacity of 48.5MW.
    While the financial result is disappointing, it reflects the exposure this
    particular investment has to two key elements over which we have no control -
    wind resource and the spot market wholesale electricity price.
    
    The main factor leading to the poor performance in FY2013 was the lack of
    wind. It was below average in both direction and speed. We generate best in
    the prevailing west north west octant; this year saw less wind from that
    direction. And the wind we did have had less than average speed hence
    strength. As a result we generated 31% less power than we had budgeted. Added
    to this, for FY2013 we experienced weaker wholesale market electricity
    prices, although this had materially less impact on the outcome than the
    lower wind resource. Wholesale electricity prices are weaker due to issues
    like increased system capacity, subdued demand and reasonable hydrology
    (there was generally adequate water stored in the hydro lakes).
    
    OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE
    
    Turbine performance showed mixed results. On the positive side, we exceeded
    our forecast availability for the financial year by achieving 95.4% versus
    the expected 95%. Availability measures the proportion of time that the
    turbines are available to generate power. General operations and maintenance
    costs came in below the budgeted levels. This is satisfying in that it
    indicates our understanding of these costs with our turbines, but not
    unexpected as lower windflows put less stress on the machinery. On the
    negative side we experienced emerging failures with some key turbine
    components e.g. gearboxes and pitch bearings. Our maintenance team installed
    additional monitoring equipment to ensure early detection of any pre-failure
    gearbox deterioration. This provides for early intervention to minimise the
    costs of repairs. Other actions, including changes to lubricants, are being
    considered. Lubricant changes for pitch bearings have extended the working
    life of this critical component.
    
    Shareholders will recall that we assumed full responsibility for operating
    and maintaining the wind farm in October 2011. This arrangement continues to
    work well. Windflow Technology's contractual warranty obligations are
    unaffected by this change. Our staff completes the warranty work on behalf of
    Windflow Technology and we invoice them for the costs incurred plus a margin.
    
    FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
    
    As noted above, the financial performance of NZ Windfarms is heavily
    dependent on both wind conditions and wholesale electricity prices, both
    subject to considerable variability. Our FY2013 revenue line reflects the
    impacts on this year's result of these two factors.
    
    Overall operating costs were in line with expectations. These costs tend to
    remain reasonably constant; they do not change that much over time.
    In FY2013 NZ Windfarms earned $6,383,000 from electricity sales. To achieve
    this outcome, the 97 turbines generated 105,662 MWh at an average price of
    $60.40/MWh. The comparatives for 2012 were revenue of $8,252,000 from 114,498
    MWh generated at an average price of $72.10/MWh.
    
    While as a renewable energy generator the Company earned emission units on
    its activities up to 31 December 2012, the current market prices for the
    emission units were at such a low level that this is only a minor contributor
    to the performance. This was the final year for emission unit entitlement.
    As noted below the company is still involved in court proceedings related to
    its resource consents and as a consequence incurred material one-off costs
    not associated with normal operations, including legal and associated expert
    expenses of $412,000.
    
    Interest income during this period was $339,000 (2012: $357,000).
    This resulted in a profit before depreciation, amortisation, impairment and
    tax of $1,654,000 for the year (2012: $2,058,000).
    
    We also report on a second significant aspect of our financial result. We
    have decided this year that we should account for a further impairment of the
    Company's assets. We asked the same questions on value as last year, and in
    recognition of uncertainties that have arisen in this period, the Board
    (again taking the same cautious approach as was taken last year) has provided
    for an additional impairment of the assets of $10,266,000.
    The decision to make this impairment followed an in-depth review by
    Directors. This review took into account all factors of which Directors are
    aware that affect the value of NZ Windfarms. These factors included:
    recognition of a recently released price path by the Ministry of Business
    Innovation and Employment, which has lowered outyear price predictions; a
    reduced production capability estimate for the farm of 130,000 MWh per annum
    which reflects our output experience with the farm; a reduction in the
    discount rate from 11% to 10% to reflect the appropriate rate in the current
    environment; and the inclusion of a more up-to-date assessment of operation
    and maintenance costs. A more detailed explanation and sensitivity analysis
    can be found at note 12 to the financial statements.
    The result after accounting for this impairment represents a valuation of
    20.6 cents per share. The Board notes the ongoing difference between the
    value of the business implied by our share price and our view of value
    contained in our impairment considerations. The Board is actively
    investigating its ability to buy back shares funded from future free cash
    flows and is expecting to seek shareholder support for this initiative at the
    AGM.
    
    When depreciation, amortisation, the large impairment and tax are included,
    the loss for the year was $8,736,000 (2012: loss of $24,599,000).
    Net assets at 30 June 2013 were $65,910,000, compared to $74,646,000 at 30
    June 2012. The decline from June 2012 to June 2013 is principally due to the
    impairment of the wind farm assets.
    
    RESOURCE CONSENTS
    
    It is taking a very long time to resolve our resource consents issues. As
    shareholders will be aware from earlier reports, the Palmerston North City
    Council sought a Declaration from the Environment Court as to whether Te Rere
    Hau is compliant with the noise conditions of its resource consent. This
    Palmerston North City Council consent covers the 65 turbines on the original
    wind farm. The consents for the 32 Batch 4 turbines on the Eastern Extension
    come under the jurisdiction of the Tararua District Council.
    The Environment Court released its decision on 4 July 2012. The Environment
    Court's decision was contrary to our expectation based on our legal advice.
    In response we took two actions. First, we lodged an appeal with the High
    Court, and second, we opened discussions with the affected residents under
    the auspices of the Palmerston North City Council. The preference was then,
    and in fact remains, to achieve an enduring solution to our resource consent
    issues through this negotiation process. Unfortunately, despite attending a
    number of meetings with residents, we were unable to reach a resolution. This
    left the Court option as the way this matter is being progressed.
    
    The High Court hearing of our appeal was heard in February 2013. The High
    Court released its decision in June and found in our favour, setting aside
    the earlier declaration by the Environment Court that we had appealed. While
    we hoped that would end the matter, the Palmerston North City Council has now
    sought leave to appeal this High Court decision to the Court of Appeal. At
    the time of writing the outcome of that approach is unknown. Should leave be
    granted, the court process will continue. Based on advice, the Company
    remains confident of its legal position.
    NZ Windfarms remains committed to ensuring that the Te Rere Hau wind farm
    operations contribute positively to the community and are fully compliant
    with the resource consent conditions.
    
    WINDFLOW TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
    
    Windflow Technology Limited is the manufacturer and warrantor of the
    machinery and performance of our turbines. While obviously we do not have
    internal information on Windflow Technology, we understand from publicly
    available information that the financial position of Windflow Technology is
    more stable than it was at this time last year. We have received regular
    warranty payments from Windflow Technology. That noted, there are still
    issues that we are working through with Windflow Technology to ensure the
    appropriate operation and maintenance of the turbines and to protect our
    entitlements under the warranty agreement.
    
    CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
    
    The Company announced to shareholders last year that it was looking at ways
    to restructure the Powerco lease. Considerable savings could be achieved if
    the lease was repaid and the bank guarantee removed. Unfortunately the
    Company has been unsuccessful in its attempts to renegotiate Lease Terms with
    Powerco and the Company is instead investigating with banks improved
    arrangements to support the Lease until such point as we have contractual
    rights to repay.
    NZ Windfarms' intended dividend policy as articulated in the April 2010
    Investment Statement and Prospectus has not changed. The objective is to
    distribute to shareholders 100% of funds surplus to the investment and
    operating requirements of the Company, as determined by the Board, and
    subject always to: the solvency requirements of the Companies Act 1993; any
    banking or other funding covenants by which the Company is bound from time to
    time; and the investment and operating requirements and expectations of the
    Company.
    
    As the Company continues to face uncertainties, it remains prudent to hold
    some surplus funds on its balance sheet to provide resources which may be
    required to address any major costs likely to arise from the ongoing resource
    consent issue, Windflow Technology uncertainties and other issues facing the
    Company.
    
    This does not imply a change in the dividend policy. The dividend policy
    recognises the need to have regard to the operating requirements of the
    Company. But the result is that for the financial year ended 30 June 2013 the
    Board has resolved that no dividend will be declared.
    
    In parallel with the matters noted above, the Board has observed that there
    is a substantial difference between the value of the business implied by the
    net asset value per share as at 30 June 2013 (after taking in to account
    impairment charges), and the current share price.
    
    The Board is therefore investigating whether the most efficient use of any
    surplus funds that the Company may have in the near term would be to buy back
    shares. Further work will be undertaken on this proposal. A further update on
    this initiative will be provided either prior to, or at, the AGM.
    
    OUTLOOK
    
    We intend to continue to work over the next year on the issues facing the
    Company, including progressing the resolution of the resource consent issues,
    the relationship with Windflow Technology, the major component reconditioning
    programme and the other issues facing the Company. We remain prepared for the
    eventualities that may well face the Company should our warranties become
    inoperative.
    
    As shareholders have been advised on a number of occasions, NZ Windfarms'
    financial performance will always be dependent on the wind flow at the site
    and the electricity market wholesale price. In what was a bad year for wind
    and prices (both below average) we did achieve a small cash surplus after
    paying off the principal component of the finance lease. We must continue to
    rely on the long term averages for prices and wind flow at the site to
    forecast the financial outcome. Like all averages, there will be years of
    unders and overs that go to make the average. Over time we expect that we
    will meet the long term averages.
    
    Finally I note that I advised the Board that I intended to stand down from
    the Board of NZ Windfarms. Being a director of this company has been a
    particularly challenging task. The Company faces difficult issues, many of
    which take a long time to resolve. Shareholders have been asked to show
    considerable patience as the Company addresses these challenges. As each
    challenge is ticked off, the position improves. It will require time and
    persistence to see the challenges concluded. I wish my colleagues well in
    continuing this work.
    
    Wyatt Creech
    Chairman
    27 August 2013
    End CA:00240415 For:NWF    Type:FLLYR      Time:2013-08-29 17:04:21
    				
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.