Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
NTL
new talisman gold mines limited
Add to My Watchlist
8.57%
!
7.6¢
!
7.6¢
Ann: WAV/RULE: NTL: NTL - Application for a Waive
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Metals & Mining SECTOR NEWS
Global Rights to Transformative Technology for PV Solar Cell Recycling Secured
18 Jun 2025 LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITEDLU7 acquires global rights to transformative PV recycling technology from Macquarie University, targeting higher material recoveries from solar waste and backed by $1.7M in investor commitments. The technology... Read more
-
Sharenot so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharelook who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareThere are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharesandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareVery direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharerogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareSo you can see both sides of the story matty.
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareAgree seuss.
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- Release Date: 06/09/13 10:44
- Summary: WAV/RULE: NTL: NTL - Application for a Waiver from Listing Rule 7.10.10
- Price Sensitive: No
- Download Document 7.72KB
NTL 06/09/2013 08:44 WAV/RULE REL: 0844 HRS New Talisman Gold Mines Limited WAV/RULE: NTL: NTL - Application for a Waiver from Listing Rule 7.10.10 Background 1. New Talisman Gold Mines Limited ("NTL") is a New Zealand incorporated Listed Issuer with ordinary shares Quoted on the NZX Main Board. NTL's ordinary shares are also Quoted on the ASX. 2. Following completion of the pre-feasibility study this year, NTL requires further funding to complete the feasibility study and associated preparatory work for reopening the Talisman Mine. NTL proposes to undertake a share purchase plan ("SPP") to raise up to approximately $1.5 million to part fund its development activities (the "NTL SPP"). 3. NZSX Listing Rule ("Rule") 7.10.10 requires Issuers to provide an Appendix 7 to NZX Limited ("NZX") at least five Business Days prior to the Ex Date to determine entitlements. Accordingly, the Record Date in respect of a SPP must be at least seven Business Days after the Issuer notifies NZX of the SPP in the form of an Appendix 7. 4. Under the ASX Listing Rules, the Record Date for a SPP must be the Business Day before an Issuer notifies ASX of the SPP. 5. Due to the conflicting timetable requirements, NTL is unable to comply with both the Rules and the ASX Listing Rules in respect of the NTL SPP. Application 6. NTL has applied to NZX Regulation ("NZXR") for a waiver from Rule 7.10.10, so that it may set the Record Date in respect of the NTL SPP as the Business Day before an Appendix 7 relating to the NTL SPP is provided to NZX. 7. In support of its application NTL makes the following submissions: a. There is no compelling policy reason for providing advance notice of the Record Date for the NTL SPP. The policy behind Rule 7.10.10 is to provide advance notice to the market of a rights issue, such that it can be "priced" by the market and the market can determine whether to trade in or out of the relevant stock by the Record Date. However, the NZX Guidance Note relating to SPPs dated 1 May 2007 recognises that "the offer under a Share Purchase Plan is not pro-rata and so may not be "priced" by the market into the price of the existing shares to the same extent as a rights issue... the market does not require, in the context of an SPP, time to "price" any payment, distribution or right". This is particularly true of the NTL SPP which is expected to be of a relatively modest size, and on that basis is not expected to have any material impact on the overall pricing of NTL's shares; b. The ASX Listing Rules did not previously stipulate any timetable requirements for SPPs. Accordingly, NZX Main Board Listed Issuers who were also listed on the ASX, were able to complete SPPs without the need for any waivers. However, in June 2010, the ASX amended its rules to impose timetable requirements on SPPs. Under these revisions, the Record Date for an SPP must be "1 Business Day before the entity announces [the] security purchase plan" (ASX Listing Rule 7.40 and Appendix 7A); c. Following those amendments to the ASX Listing Rules, there is an irreconcilable conflict between the Rules and the ASX Listing Rules, which means that an NZX Main Board Listed Issuer that is also listed on the ASX is not able to comply with the Record Date requirements of both exchanges; d. In its consultation paper relating to its amendments to the SPP Record Date requirements, ASX noted that requiring the Record Date to be backdated to the Business Day before the announcement date of an SPP "will not detract from the underlying principle of the SPP, of providing long-term shareholders the opportunity to purchase at no brokerage, and possibly at a discount to the market price, as a reward for their loyalty"; e. One of the principal reasons why ASX accelerated the Record Date for SPPs was that they had received a number of complaints that having a Record Date post announcement could contribute to a disorderly market by incentivising short selling and delayed settlements by sellers who wished to remain on the register as at the Record Date so as to be eligible to participate in a SPP; f. If the Record Date for the NTL SPP was post announcement, NTL considers that there would be a possibility that the market could "game" the offer. Because an SPP is not pro-rata, investors can exploit an SPP by purchasing the minimum number of shares for the Record Date, subscribing at the discounted issue price, which is common in SPPs and then trading out of the stock. Similarly, existing investors could "split" their investment across different entities so as to be eligible to participate in the SPP multiple times. It would not be possible to "game" the SPP in this manner, if the Record Date is the Business Day prior to announcement; g. NTL shares have been relatively thinly traded in recent times. As such, granting the waiver should mean that: (i) long-term shareholders obtain the opportunity to participate in the NTL SPP; and (ii) there is no opportunity for third parties who would not otherwise trade the stock, to "game" the NTL SPP and derive an unwarranted benefit at the cost of long-term shareholders; h. If the waiver is not granted, the NZX Main Board and ASX requirements as to the Record Date are not reconcilable and NTL may not be able to undertake the NTL SPP. A waiver from Rule 7.10.10 will allow the NTL SPP to be completed, which NTL considers will be beneficial to its shareholders. Rule 7.10.10 8. Rule 7.10.10 provides that: "Where a Rights issue is to be made but Quotation is not sought the Issuer shall give to NZX forthwith after the decision has been made and at least 5 Business Days before the Ex Date to determine entitlements, on the form in Appendix 7, full details of the issue, including the nature, entitlement and timing of the issue of Rights and conversion, pricing, amounts payable and ranking of Securities for future benefits." Decision 9. On the basis that the information provided to NZXR is full and accurate in all material respects, NZXR grants NTL a waiver from Rule 7.10.10, so that it may set the Record Date in respect of the NTL SPP as the Business Day before an Appendix 7 relating to the NTL SPP is provided to NZX. 10. The waiver in paragraph 10 is granted on the condition that the Record Date for the NTL SPP is the Business Day before the Appendix 7 relating to the NTL SPP is provided to NZX. Reasons 11. In coming to this decision, NZXR has considered the following matters: ? a. Following the amendment of the ASX Listing Rules, there is an irreconcilable difference between the timetabling requirements in the Rules and the ASX Listing Rules. In the absence of a waiver from either exchange, NTL, as an NZX Main Board Listed Issuer who is also listed on the ASX, is unable to raise additional capital by way of a SPP; b. NTL should not be disadvantaged by being precluded from raising additional capital through a SPP simply because it is listed on both the ASX and the NZX Main Board; c. Neither NTL nor NTL's shareholders will be disadvantaged by NTL conducting the NTL SPP in accordance with the ASX timetable requirements. Those timetable requirements are not inconsistent with NZX's policy in respect of SPPs generally, and are able to be accommodated within NZX's operational infrastructure; and d. Requiring the Record Date to be backdated to the Business Day before the announcement date of an SPP will not detract from the underlying principle of the SPP, which is to provide long-term shareholders with the opportunity to purchase shares at no brokerage, and possibly at a discount to the market price, as a reward for their loyalty. 12. NTL has requested that NZX keep this waiver confidential until such date as NTL announces the NTL SPP. 13. In accordance with Footnote 1 to Rule 1.11.2, NZXR grants NTL's request. End CA:00240793 For:NTL Type:WAV/RULE Time:2013-09-06 08:44:06Price at posting: 1.1¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held -
-
ShareWe'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareShadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareMaybe this sheds some light on it ............................
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI get your drift joewolf.
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareAt this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareWhat a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
The Watchlist
CDE
CODEIFAI LIMITED
John Houston / Martin Ross, Executive Chairman / COO
John Houston / Martin Ross
Executive Chairman / COO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online