3,523,000 scf/d, page-54

Curry

Someone with more expertise should be answering this, but there is to be expected variable flow rates whilst there is flow back of fluids. Nothing unusual here. I think though, that the 0.91 reading was what they were trying to 'understand and evaluate'. Once cleaned up though, should stabilise and readings will be more accurate.

I'm still cautious, but can't deny there's a part of me that's got that Big Kev feeling!