Like a lot of the rules surrounding ALDP it can be interpreted 2 ways.
It's like certain stock supporters believe strongly that some companies are gagged from naming any partners, off takers, funders etc... when other alleged contenders seem free to announce anything but the actual ALDP process.
I just wonder how companies that miss out will explain the reason for their lack of success in the program.
For instance if they were to miss out because of a lack of funding, how would they explain that lack of funding when the rules clearly state funding is needed, and the company has clearly stated to shareholders via the ASX that unconditional funding is available, and that they have put together a comprehensive submission and have a high level of confidence.
Interesting times ahead for all contenders. I am certainly nervous about Exergen's chances at this stage, despite GHD calling them the benchmark in the Aus BC benefication space.
All IMO & dyor
Cheers
B Rubes
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AUL
- aldp - frequently asked questions (faqs)
aldp - frequently asked questions (faqs), page-5
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 67 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AUL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan, Geologist - David Trabert
MD - Shanthar Pathmanathan
Geologist - David Trabert
SPONSORED BY The Market Online