empror,
you can repeat it as much as you like.
it won't make the oregon petition any less irrelevant, or discredited.
your insistence on repeating again and again shows an inability to absorb new information.
the petition is crap.
its appearance was deceptive
its criteria was too broad to be meaningful
it's not statistically significant
and it's certainly not science.
you might want read up on it some time
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- climatologists face inconvenient truth
climatologists face inconvenient truth , page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)