At the current rate of expenditure, the NPV of Kylylahti ( using direct costs and allocation of HO overheads) is probably close to zero.
This may be true in a net sense but in gross terms Kyl made $18M profit last year, so when normalised to 4 quarters of full production (instead of 3), gradual refinements in efficiency, and lower capital expenditure, it should be capable of generating at least $25M a year.
The problems are that AOH has frittered away that $18M in Australia in admin and Roseby costs (plus $5M writedowns on Kuhmo).
Kyl itself would I think be quite a valuable asset to Boliden. But they would have to move soon because currently AOH are mining it away for effectively zero net profit. Every year AOH remain in charge of it they are destroying the NPV for someone like Boliden.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AOH
- boliden play
boliden play, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AOH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online