24 hours after the events in the Greenland parliament I think I've got it.
The Big Question: Why would those opposing repeal of the U ban - which at this stage is only an "In Principle" decision - do so when common sense, science, good experience of U mining elsewhere such as in nearby Canada, and the long term interests (jobs, royalty revenue, etc) of the Greenlandic people cry out for a Yes vote?
It makes no sense.
Except when you ask yourself, who has the most to lose from a Yes vote?
The Usual Suspects:
1. China (currently controls 95% of global Rare Earth supply).
2. Competing Rare Earth miners (There's one near Kvanefjeld which has has no, or minimal, uranium to worry about).
3. Greenpeace (funded largely by oil interests who oppose nuclear power since it competes with oil).
Ah, now it makes sense.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETM
- something's afoot
something's afoot
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.99M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 850000 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.4¢ | 101094 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 850000 | 0.022 |
1 | 427254 | 0.021 |
2 | 2384005 | 0.020 |
5 | 1160052 | 0.019 |
3 | 1949857 | 0.018 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.024 | 101094 | 1 |
0.025 | 290329 | 7 |
0.028 | 1463126 | 3 |
0.029 | 120000 | 1 |
0.030 | 138094 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 10/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable