conservative media climate change bias, page-105

  1. 20,048 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 878
    That's the last straw Stanislaw - accusing me of a multi-nic - that is not allowed here on HC and I'm busy enough as it is anyway. I am offended by that accusation. I've got better things to do, to be honest. I agree it is strange to see my posts getting thumbs up on here, I admit that, but things here on HC have been changing over the past year or so. There are fewer gullible people ready to accept the crazy climate change denial and wacky conspiracy theories of a few crusty, conservative older men with super portfolios chock full of coal, oil and gas assets.

    And to deny that we humans, with our deforestation and agriculture, our billions and billions of tonnes of coal, oil and gas combustion, have increased the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere... That is simply beyond the pale. Who or what was the cause? The Martians? Ian Plimer's undersea volcanoes that no one can find?? Bye bye.

    P.S. You do realise that the scientists can tell from the C14 and C13/C12 ratios whether the CO2 was combusted (from previously buried fossil fuels) or came from a 'natural' source, like ocean outgassing, don't you? Presumably not.

    P.P.S. Same goes for you and your 'human CO2' denial, Walbrook.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.