Ann: September 2013 Quarterly Report , page-13

Hi Paul.

Please define EASILY please.
I want to use the word against you or for you in 2014.

Given your guru status what will the price of gold in 2014.
I may as well invest in what you say on that one.

Also, regarding PGI and your investment in that one. Do you have another one of those you can advise me to invest in.

I just I should do what you do.
Invest in PGI and don't invest in MAD.
and squabble squabble squabble squabble.

MATE - this investment business is not about your ego and I told you so(s) - every time it drops.

Sidenote: I wonder if you would talk up Yeager if he was appointed at PGI. Because your only reference to him is that
he pushed the share price and this was LUCKY for investors.

Methinks I should run MAD - based on your logic, because a man of his calibre will make no difference to a company's performance. I am so relieved of this PAUL. Saves me a lot of time not having to take into consideration a person who knows very high up people, many people with oddles of money, has influence over suppliers, has influence over buyers (including getting that extra 3% from his buyers - maybe instilling a SOLE DISTRIBUTOR status). He might have some new staff coming in and stagnant ones going out. Hey he might of thought that the graph is just a dumb idea because he wants to build the share price and not have the market to be conditioned to track the flow of production as the only determinant. AND - he knows what he is doing, so he has less mistakes that others to write off AND AND AND he knows what to focus on EXPLICITLY to build share holder value.

Oh and that GULF dead thing and it's stupidity - right or wrong - what does that have to do with Yeagar and the future - very whingy for a non-investor - Mr Paul.

Anyway - I'm bullish. I'm backing the CEO, I'm backing the 1PP and 2PP as per the scientists. I am backing the increase in the production Qtr by Qtr. I am backing RBS putting an intrinsic value of $1.50 in 2013/14 on the company.

(note: You mention a prediction of a lower Oct production flow - based on the graph not being there and in another sentence you say that you only look at Qtr by Qtr - ODD)