voting intentions, page-25

The issue may have been the Chinese Geologists went over the interpretations, allowing some level of respect of the opinion of people who had been doing it on site for years. They may well have started with all the reports generated over the years. Would they have had time to pour over digital records and core logs other than to verify they existed and were consistent with the report they were reading? Pure speculation by me of course.

I suspect now they want to see every bit of raw data underpinning any commentary or interpretation. I could not imagine it being any other way.

I don't doubt they are smart, probably a lot smarter than you trying to read Chinese mining reports, lets put it that way. Just saying.

Noticeable lately by their absence are all those big mouths and self promoters.