http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/media/07adco.html?_r=0
http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images.php?token2=fm_st001.php&token1=fm_img0002.php&theme_file=fm_mt001.php&theme_name=Doctors%20Smoking&subtheme_name=More%20Doctors%20Smoke%20Camels
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/
I'm not sifting thru to find the data they used but they had plenty from reputable sources...
This was an easier subject to emphasise a point... As hard as It would of been to find data on the other side back then - it is now for our discussion.
Crazy huh!? Back then it was doctors and company shills- today it's politicians and company shills..
How about u find me peer reviewed data that shows 100% of Americas fracking adventures were successful without incident of contamination ...I'll save U the trouble- u won't- the " peer reviewed" part will prove to difficult.
Maybe u should apply some of that "critical analysis" I so lack because I think u have ur blinkers on..
To use any kind of proper scientific analysis it is dishonest to say with 100% that everything/ anything comes up rosey...what pr firm do u work for?
I present another side, which by the sounds of it, u completely dismiss. By Working In absolutes like that u erode the quality of everything else u have to say...
And at the end of it all this isn't directly related to BUL? Its about a factually dishonest statement in an otherwise informative news story, which for me- erodes whatever else is said in it.. A bit like u...stop getting so defensive..
Imo...DYOR...ignore spelling mistakes ext it's 4:30am..
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BUL
- the trend is your friend
the trend is your friend , page-66
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)