I repeat
I am not underwater. I am fascinated by the interaction of stakeholders with the market. it is very interesting
I disclosed that way back, my minimalist approach given the headline blue sky.
the question I ask myself is this :
How do we know that 80% of 'informative' (especially unsupported info) posts relaying quasi-expert analysis or quasi-valuative opinion are not just a concoction of top 20 holders or anyone with a vested interest?
I will admit I am worried that in fact the soc exploration target upside as relayed thus far has altered given the recent annpouncements.
I wonder further how have these results impacted on the IP result, given the emphasis on arcadia over the '40 times Hobbs target'
I'd rather hear a genuine opinion rather than a vested spruikers spam booklet
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SOC
- what went wrong ?
what went wrong ?, page-42
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 92 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
Add SOC (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
10.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.89M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 38064 | 9.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
10.0¢ | 50000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 38064 | 0.098 |
2 | 227222 | 0.090 |
1 | 80000 | 0.081 |
1 | 13902 | 0.072 |
1 | 200000 | 0.065 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.100 | 50000 | 2 |
0.110 | 22205 | 1 |
0.120 | 12545 | 1 |
0.130 | 97482 | 2 |
0.150 | 700000 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SOC (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable