Small shareholders are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
If the deal goes ahead, MMC have funds for 1 more year but effectively have to surrender the company to Sentient.
If they ( Sentient) hold 65 % of the shares, they control all decisions unilaterally. That may or may not be a good thing.
Massively dilutionary also, value of our shares is halved.
If deal doesn't go ahead, then its likely they have to sell the asset , and shareholders get the proceeds.Unless they can raise working capital another way.
Either way, not good for small shareholders.
Can't see much upside, but maybe ? a smaller share of a bigger pie is better ( as in, developing to the mine stage)
And then , what happens at the end of 2014, when they're out of money again ?
Which way will the institutional holders vote do you think?
This changes the playing field considerably.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MMC
- refinance
refinance, page-5
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MMC (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
MTL
MANTLE MINERALS LIMITED
Nick Poll, Executive Director
Nick Poll
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online