I'm not following this line of conversation at all. i.e: 1. There are no salt diapirs 2. The YG-SH basin is characterised by mud-shale diapirs 3. Cua Lo sits directly above a diapir 4. DF11 fields are at shallower depths, i.e vertically non-analogous to Cua Lo-1 payzones 5. Cua Lo-1 payzones are mainly lower Pliocene, with some upper miocene shows, where as DF11 are upper Pliocene - arguably Pleistocene. 6. The logs, side by side are not telling me much (non analogous depth).
NEN Price at posting:
31.7¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held