email from citation, page-50

gassed...

So you are suggesting posters should talk their books in spite of their honest views on the way CTR is being managed?

Thnaks for that...it helps greatly in my interpretation of your posts.

Sorry, but the majority of your post reads like something from a year-12 debating team...you know, the ones where you are given an argument you must present, whether you believe it or not?

I have been invested in CTR for cloe to 18 months...based on significant reaserch into the area they are drilling and the assets they hold, and direct communications from the Company in relation to corporate plans to monetise said assets.

It is not some one-day-trade wonder I got stuck in, and certainly was not at the behest of a call from a broker to take part in a recent 2c placement.

You are asking the question of others, so let me ask you...when did you buy shares in CTR...and why?

The recent article is nothing but a side-show...and frankly I am not sure why you keep bringing it up, unless to divert attention from the obvious.

And spare us the year-12 chest beating guff...where do you get off calling everyone "amateur legal eagles"...shareholders have every right to express concerns over the way their Company is being managed.

I respectfully suggest most have been on what some might discribe as the CTR trainwreck much longer than you.

Did you really post this...

"Well, there have been 669 reads of those three posts and several replies that got several TUs, no less, but,not one person has picked up that I had, deliberately, left off three 0's and those numbers are actually 2.5 million, not thousand!! So, just a small example on how you could get smashed if you continue to persist with your current approach."

Deliberately?

Please...it is obvious you only picked it up AFTER I suggested you check your numbers again, so your claim nobody picked up on it is also false.

From my post further up in the thread...

"And...I would check your claims of just 2,500 shares trading in 6 days...I can't remember any period in which that happened.

I suggest this statement is incorrect"

Your error was clearly the result of checking back on the charts, where the volumes are displayed in "x,xxx" x1000.

This tells me you were not even watching CTR in this period, but you were when the 80m or so shares traded.

gassed...you need to assume people on HC are not dills, in fact some are far from it...else you yourself risk looking like one.

One final point, in spite of your error in leaving out three zeros on the volumes traded, I think we all agree that the period immediately after that announcement saw some of the lowest trading levels in CTR in recent times.

Prior to this, selling pressure had been quite significant...but after the announcement, this virtually stopped in its tracks and for the first time in a while there was a tentative return to buying interest...especially obvious in the options.

So, you yourself have highlighted the fact trading activity in CTR did in fact change due to the announcement...from heavy selling to buying, albeit with a flat period as the cycle shifted.

Thanks for highlighting that for us all.

Cheers!