If there is global warming a technical fix is required. No such technical fix yet exists, so how many people do you reckon would like to live in Pol Pot's Nirvana? Aside for my extreme skepticism of even short term forecasts (extremely expensive boll roll of the lowest quality at best imo), the forecasts would indicate that there are several decades to develop solutions. So who do you think more likely to develop solutions: A fossil fuel burning, wealthy and developed economy with a skilled and educated population and good infrastructure, or a cesspit of a country, corruptly governed, abysmal infrastructure, and an uneducated, unskilled and poor population who grow their own food? I'm with Lomborg on this question.
