india on the move , page-50

OBW,

I guess Tincom remains re-engaged in an iterative process too ? The last ESI announcement wrt Tincom states ''re-engagement of Tincom.,, but no continuous disclosure.

Fear campaign ? Would that have something to do with continuous disclosure ?

spraying ''stuff '' ?

you mean like,,,, who's Monash ?

Or do you mean something more recent like,,,, when did Minister Macfarlane relax ALDP disclosure criteria for public listed companies involved with ALDP ?

Perhaps in a coupla days,, the esi threads will be saying,,,, Who's Lind ????


The ESI 56th half yearly report should be a good read imminently.

That's 28 years worth, for no commercial return by way of dividends or sp appreciation ?

Oh,, Coldry works all right,,we just don't know what the CAPEX & OPEX is,,,but I see references being sprayed around on HC putting 15 bux,, to 25 bux,,, and now 30 bux a tonne off shore ?? No sovereign risk ? total process secured by how many fresh,, new,, patents ? ,,,, How mach did ESI state to ALDP it could make a demo tonne of coldry ? 20 bux ? 50 bux ? 75 bux ? How do you know anything OBW ?

Are you on the company consultant books OBW ?

with so many techs out there with catalytic conversion etc,,,, why do we never hear from the company regarding how competitive the ol' dry coldry tech is ?

How coincidental it was for a wondrous blurb from amazed and the JC Steele meat grinder style extrusion upgrade to have coincided with perhaps a certain 2 finger pellet crush mid year ? By a certain expert panel ?

So far as exploring legal options are concerned, OBW, there are always at LEAST,, 2 sides to a, ''story''.

So far as fear campaigns are concerned,,,, continuous disclosure is a must.

There is no excuse for boo hooing from the company's perspective, given the amount, and focus of questions put to this forum in particular,, over the last 6 years or more ?

, over the many ( 28 ) years of failure to deliver scenarios, never actually clarified in a satisfactory ASX news, or clarification of dropping one direction, and picking up a new one ? ,,

,, by a company that states share holder value implies valuing shareholders,,, not just a handful of share holders?

It may or may not interest you to know that the motives of most holders or stake holders that contact [email protected], are motivated by integrity related issues. But not all.

Fear campaign,,,,, really ? or is it more a reality check ?


imho please dyor.