It's a horse-cart story.
Asset ownership --> determines offtake recipients ---> Choice of EPC provider (China or non-China)
There is no such thing as partly Chinese owned, partly non-Chinese owned assets.
Winner takes all.
IMO, all road leads to Rome. That is 100% asset sale.
Unless someone can tell me why would the NDRC would settle for 50% of the asset (not knowing where the other 50% will go in 6 months).
Makes little sense even if they sign up for 50% initially and allow for the option to acquire the rest at a price (no less than the origianl sale).
Pointless really.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SDL
- sdl should go with europe
sdl should go with europe , page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 110 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity