In Plain Sight was typical conspiracy rubbish, they misrepresented the evidence and offered no opposing views.
The assertion that the hight of the plain exceeded the hight at which the tail would have hit the pentagon is flawed. They showed the hight of the plain with the landing gear down. Considering that the impact was on the lower floor the landing gear could not have been down.
They also claimed that a plain could not have punctured serval rings of the pentagon. this is also false as the plain is pressurize and would act like a solid object. This effect can be demonstrated by folding a plastic drinking straw at one end, the straw will then be able to puncture through a potato.
- Forums
- General
- 9-11 conspiracy theories
9-11 conspiracy theories, page-93
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 72 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online