re: Ann: Little Eva Definitive Feasibility St... Agree with mic231 regarding relative cost risks.
Finland is a more complex situation and mining has had to adapt to a changing picture of the orebody geometry. Also we are currently paying to store Ni-Co, although we expect this will eventually pay itself back, but this is linked to the more complicated mineralogy of the Kylylahti orebody.
As a more bulk mining operation, Little Eva should be less affected by details of geometry. Also the more simple mineralogy (and the correspondingly simple flow sheet) should make overall costs more predictable. In my opinion.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AOH
- Ann: Little Eva Definitive Feasibility Study Cost
Ann: Little Eva Definitive Feasibility Study Cost, page-11
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AOH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
BM8
BATTERY AGE MINERALS LTD
Nigel Broomham, CEO
Nigel Broomham
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online