Ann: Acquisition Update , page-20

Thanks Hangseng for the civil posting :)

Just checked your pdf link, & yes we have been over this TAC Document before, there were a few concerns that I brought up with BLR Management at the time, regarding some issues that the TAC had mentioned.

I can confide that the questions I brought forward to management at the time, were covered with what I feel appropriate responses.


The TAC have been well known to bend the truth to gain the utmost media attention, & may I say they have down to a fine art.



In regards to water quality within the Hansen resource, prior Cyprus mines records suggest water quality within Hansen was deemed UN-pottable, & too highly contaminated for feedstock. The water quality within the Taylor area ? I'm not too sure, but one would presume it to be similar to Hansen due to the geology of the region being almost identical.

One would assume that the aquifer systems would be inter connected between Hansen & Taylor (emphasis on assume).


I was also given a very similar view on water quality from Kinley Exploration.




In regards to permitting time-frames, from what I can understand there has been considerable efforts made over the most recent time to speed up Mining Projects within the region.

Read recently that the NRC either are, or currently in the process of implementing a simplified permitting format, to a less time consuming Question & Answer format.

But still no doubt challenging !




Cheers from G64 :)



.