"But for every point they raised with just a bit of extra effort I could find perfectly reasonable arguments to counter them, each and every time"
Oh really. So what's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT that there is NO plane at the pentagon? What's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT that building 7 collapsed? What's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT that there is molten steel? What's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT that network TV shows flashes of light just before the nose of each plane hit the towers? What's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT there is NO plane on the Pentagons CCTV footage they released? What's your "reasonable argument" for the FACT that a commercial airliner cannot do 500mph at sea level as reported?
You are all so blind with preconceived beliefs that you have not even looked at the FACTS. You claim you have, but it's plainly obvious you are lying to add credibility to your dismissal.
The majority of the official story is THEORY. What we are questioning, and we have full right to do so, is present FACTS (as per above) and reassess the THEORY given by the media and government. Without PROOF, their story is only THEORY. If they have PROOF, then let them present it. Lets see the 23 CCTV cameras at the Pentagon. Lets see the plane. The black box. The bodies. They dont provide these things, because they do have them!
