9/11 explosive evidence, page-319

  1. 3,048 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5
    John you've already admitted that you're not an expert and that you'd love to hear from a engineer or demolition expert, and guess what I'm not an engineer either so let's not kid ourselves and pretend by watching a 30 minute youTube video either of us has the expertise to make critical judgements about these structures.

    But here is a lengthy document written by structural engineers that does explain how WT7 collapsed, without explosives being involved.

    http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

    And I'd like to pose one other question. If this was indeed a conspiracy and a "false flag" attack devised and carried out by the US government. They already have an incredibly intricate plan that needs to be executed to perfection, a crash into the Pentagon and the grand finale of two planes spectacularly crashing into the Twin Towers and then bringing them down by pre-planted explosives.

    Now at anytime leading up and during their are huge risks of something going wrong and being caught out planning the "conspiracy of the century", most notably the secret demolition crew getting noticed precisely planting explosives throughout the twin towers in the lead up.

    Now ask yourself would they really take on the additional risk of demolishing some insignificant minor building that just happened to be in the vicinity of the twin towers? You've got to ask yourself what's the point? It just adds further risk of being caught out for absolutely zero effect.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.