adams update, page-24

Hi frogga,

I got no beef with vintage, and I'll take straight up his/her answer...but on the same thread as pre empt has asked (albeit maybe too forcefully!) I have to say a small degree of suspicion crept in my mind, that I'd like abated.

On its own, vintage's responses are precise, factual and timely. But...

On the basis ONLY that at present there is some serious capping of sp, ridiculously low volume yet upside ahead (forgive ramping but I think we mostly agree on this). So I think pre empt is drawing a bow between this (evidence) and the coincidental timing of vintage coming in to shoot down any semblance of good news that comes out, which was material news (I felt, as I feel punters reading this feel that this sml coming up now is "the Clayton's sml. That is, the sml you are having when you are not having an sml". And I think I'd attribute it to some of these small items, perhaps exasserbated when introduced in a staccato fashion as they are. (personally, I am non plussed by them as am lt holder)

So...vintage (gulp) I am just going to ask you same - for my own curiosity at least if you are affiliated with the negative sentiment and price capping? If I am wrong, you have my apologies in advance. But that said, money at stake for many/most here so no point bottling it up.

On the main I appreciate your posts vintage, so trust I'll sit with no malice, but a fair amount of bad timing came into play here. The timing of this stupid capping with near zero volume, upside ahead does make one wonder.

As an act of transparency I'll tell you that have had cica 356,060 sitting on 3.3c for almost a week now and not much ahead of me. Yet, still return to 3.3c each day (bar today) courtesy of the artist formerly known as botman.

So...no sour grapes if I am just a holder who wants his price to rise. On this I don't warrant any special favours...but on this one frogga I don't see a problem asking the question, if vintage you would be so kind? Trust that I will take your answer as truth and i won't challenge it.

Noting of course that lightening shouldn't strike twice.....should it???

That, and I love a good conspiracy theory!