adams update, page-31

You are 'new' to posting on the PEN thread Gavin. Perhaps you are unaware the alleged 'capping', to which you refer, has seemingly been happening with this share, off and on, for many, many years.

Like you with Vintage, I have no beef with you either. But like me, some here may find it interesting that you have only ever posted on the PEN thread since you joined HC back in Dec of last year, and it took you until March of 2014 to begin posting.

In the past week, according to one of your posts, you 'picked up another five million shares on weakness and are ready for some more'. So, as you have written yourself, I thought you'd be happy if the 'SML date was/is extended'. It won't change the long play.... and that is what you have said you are here for.

A degree of suspicion has also crept into my mind, but not in regards to Vintage. That said, I will continue to believe that you only invest in one company at a time. Or, at least only post on one stock at a time.

I will also continue to believe that the hundreds of thousands of dollars you have supposedly invested, HAS been invested with the knowledge and realisation that what Vintage, you, me or anyone else writes on HC, WILL NOT make or break this company in the long run.

With your third post, you informed all that 'you considered Simpson, Gregor et al to be truly world class management'. I take it you didn't hold shares in PEN a couple of years back....... I too love a good conspiracy theory Gavin.

If Vintage's posts are inaccurate, TOU them or slam them with a factual rebuttal. Otherwise, just continue to hoover up all these cheap shares and continue to enjoy thoughts of your pending retirement.

In your first post on HC (and PEN), you told us that you had 'actively read many of our posts for many years, and as such, was quite well versed with this company'.

Given the above, why are you now (politely or otherwise), questioning Vintage's motives? If you have indeed been reading the thread for 'many years', if you truly consider management to be 'world class', by comparison, surely Vintage must be the messiah! I know who has been more accurate over this time.

More to this than meets the eye folks. (imo of course).