cdu likelyup soon in senate inquiry into asic, page-168

Roh,

You wrote:


"An unusual strategy for a junior explorer but tactically very sound ."

You could have fooled me mate.


"Had it not been done CuDeco would have more shares on issue and, as you are a stated large shareholder, you can appreciate the better position you are now in."

Well what good did that do.?? After all we still have more shares on issue than what we had at the time.

Most importantly though Roh, you have intentionally left out the buy-back shares which were re-issued at a lower price than what they were bought back for.

NOW Roh, Why was that.??? Why didn't you mentioned about them.???



"You complain about the share price but have a look at the share price positions of companies across the mining sector and where they used to be."

I am not concerned at what the share price of other companies out there is . A very poor excuse it is as far as I am concerned. For we are talking about CDU here not other companies. And I may not invested in other companies that you are referring to either.
Don't stray away from the reality of what is facing us. Our reality is CDU and that is what we will have to discuss.



"It is not a pretty picture and will remain so particularly for the junior explorers as money is tight for that sector and, in my opinion, will remain so for the foreseeable future."

As above and not relevant to our discussions.



"That is the reality of the situation. Holders of shares in our neighbours QMN,GBZ and AOH would be well aware of what has happened to their share prices."

As above. And I couldn't care less at what those companies are doing as we are discussing CDU in these threads.
Don't make a poor attempt of straying away from the subject point.
CDU is what we are talking about here and let's keep it that way and in that road.
Just look at the header of this thread and see what it reads, then come back to me.



"None of these companies have managed to succeed in getting any of their projects at Cloncurry to mining as CuDeco is doing."

As above, and more crap and baseless at that.

Just read the header once again and stick to comments based entirely on CDU. As to how the Mods aren't pulling you up on that, that I fail to understand.



"Shareholders in AOH were unfortunate in trying to get away their Roseby project when Xstrata pulled out. Those people who thought it was a done deal and purchased on that basis would rue taking their decision."

Again, more of the same. Baseless and totally unrelated comments based solely on hot air.



"Even if QMN, GBZ or AOH were today to announce their intention to mine at Cloncurry, it would be a long time before they got to actually mine."

As above and IMHO it is a total waste of HC pixels in regard to CDU. CDU is the focus point here, not what those companies are doing.



"CuDeco is mining right now."

Finally you come to be talking about CDU.

And yes we are mining. But mining what, when, if we are to be taking out all the conjectures posted in these threads, NONE OF US actually know what we have mined and at what grades and as to when we will be selling any of that DSO, and at what grades.

Go figure!!!!

One thing is for sure to me. And that is that, those baseless rampings and conjectures never seems to stop. Especially when the next way of ramping is based solely on making comparisons to other companies which could be worth less.

Let's keep it CDU and it's related issues, shall we.??