Yes Illio, which makes it even more ridiculous. It is $6.5B for an idea that is backed by a person with a dubious history of failed deals, and which the premier has dismissed. It is completely different to be talking about contracts with values backed in multiples by the IGV of resources to be exploited.
I can't understand why non-holders are talking about faith and unrelated history when the information received thus far leaves little opportunity for pipe-dreams to be realised. Unless perhaps it is for brownie points.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?