director sells more shares, page-82

I actually cant see any reason why directors would prefer the price at 7c instead if 10. If there were any activities designed to achieve explicitly or through collusion then that is an extreme offence and doubt the directors would be involved in such antics. If however there were to be a cap raising and if brokers had been intimated to such then would be in their interests to keep the price low. But that would not be in the company interests and if this knowledge existed would constitute another breach. The trading patterns suggest intervention by traders and probaby they like the range subject to volume. Until some actual information from the company this is life in the land of joining nanodots.