one whole month without a tweet, page-39

Smilez,

"Your view is completely without research so it is null and void..."

People with research often get it wrong, people without research often get it right. I've watched lots of companies, and the pattern of sell the news is very common, especially after a large buildup in share price.

"you are most welcome on here but your "alternate" view is nothing more than a cheap shot"

Beats me why you think it is a cheap shot. I just said I've been thinking of investing but fear the m/c might be a bit high. You would have to be ridiculously touchy to take offense at that.

"if you think the market cap is too high put some numbers down on how you get to your figure..."

Maybe it depends on whether figures are announced if a deal happens. If it's shrouded in secrecy, then people will have to guess. They might guess too high, which is ideal, or they might guess too low, which seems to be the case with OBJ.

"im highlighting that clearly you made that comment with no idea on how the two upcoming possible deals will impact ADO sp.."

I've read announcements every day for the last 3 years...

"... and the impact that ADO will have in bioseperations market/industry.. and many others moving forward..."

Yep, I don't know. I don't believe you know either.

"Bring some researched informative posts to ADO and i will be all ears..."

I'm not here to impress you. I'm here to talk about possible investment. Besides, there's no rule that commentators need to be researched at all.

The obsession with research that some people have is just a way to parry away views they don't like - "If you aren't researched, then we researchers won't listen to you." Trouble with that approach is that the so-called researchers are usually true believers and are therefore biased. Many other researchers might have quit earlier because they saw the weaknesses of whatever company they were researching, and they wouldn't bother posting because they've moved on. So you can end up with a bunch of people "researching" and collaborating in ferreting out the positives, and using the "researcher" status to ignore and mock those who are more open minded.

"Best you check MG's history with OBJ before you go defending his views on ADO??"

Anyone who did so would find that I was repeatedly ridiculed, yet proven to be repeatedly correct:

- I warned of a CR, got ridiculed, and a CR happened.
- I said management didn't need to be so quiet about business timeframes, and everyone freaked out about secrecy, then management started giving clearer timeframes and even told the stock broker about a P&G product collaboration.
- I said OBJ disagreed that OBJ would announce involvement with Ariel and they didn't.

Etcetera.