Replacement prospectus out. Imagine they think they should get paid salaries for this sort of rework. STILL disappointed that they don't have adequate corp finance or accounting experience within the company. Again I must ask why the soil scientist is on this type of announcement. Imho the CR situation is critically important. It's a bad enough look without needing a replacement prospectus. And these sorts of announcements should be signed off by people with credible experience. Not just someone you saw at the water cooler. This beggars belief
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- Question
Question, page-67
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)