Oh dear - the ugly past, page-3

Hi, all, IMO only it may be incorrect. Never was the expression caveat emptor more appropriate. The evidence presented in the SMH suggests to me that we have all been conned in the last couple of years. I always suspected things were not quite kosher though I had b-all support on the forum . At least now we have something in common! I initially put down IDC's failure to advance the project to incompetent management but it looks as though it was rather more than that. Clearly the hierarchy have to be held responsible , they have to go, no "ifs" or "buts" on that score. Good luck to those of you who are prepared to ride out the storm and are relying on an E.G.M. to resolve the worsening situation. Frankly I think it's fool hardy (Maybe we don't have that much in common after all.) I have a solution to your problem , at least it might bring you some short term satisfaction. Get Roger Rogerson to recommend several of his acquaintances to join the Captain on a delegation to "visit" IDC to right the wrongs so to speak. The Captain is the ideal candidate , he obviously is extremely athletic, he swims and runs 10kms. every week, perfect if things get a trifle physical. He also distrusts management, he's just the man to sort it out. BOLTA (you'll need it!)