Ann: Nickel-Copper-PGE Target Identified at Leonora, page-7

Miller or others - A question to those who attended the shareholders meeting....

Did the discussion around the Kingfisher investigation include any reference to the potential of the PGE metals that are represented in the historical data?

Hole HWD02 included 1.8m @ 1.55 g/t Pt and 6.5 g/t Pd at 100m deep
Hole HWP9 included 2.0m @ 0.45g/t Pt and 0.65 g/t Pd at 78m deep

Those two holes are a reasonable distance apart, so considering (from the recent announcement).

“By compiling all of the historical data, we have been able to view the prospect in 3D software, which has highlighted the continuity of the previously drilled mineralisation along the basal contact.”

“We immediately became aware that the mineralised contact has not been tested at depth and that there is potential for further massive sulphides below the historical intersections and along strike.”

If it turns out that more PGE metals spread along the contact, and at depth, doesn't this add significantly to the potential?

Would be interested if there was any more info given on this .

Alpaka