Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Wind farms are a joke, page-58

First 58 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pintohoo

96,638 Posts.

75

29/07/14

13:36

Post #: 13731226
Share

Originally posted by Gneissic ↑

You do not understand what I meant by "running costs" do you?

I did indicate what I meant a little further on in my post. Perhaps you didn't notice. The RET is about replacing filthy polluting coal burners with clean renewables. Every MWH of wind power replaces coal that would otherwise have been burnt. Both major parties have agreed that this reduction in pollution is a valuable service.

Our beautiful wind turbines are expensive to build even though the free wind brings running costs close to zero as I stated before and you misinterpreted. This capital expense is offset against fund from the RET and the wholesale price. We need the RET maintained and continued so we can build more of these elegant, functional structures. Thank goodness PUP is there to provide the inexperienced coalition government with sound, grown up guidance.

Expand

ok, I agree, these ones are very cheap to run. In fact, they cost nothing

http://toryaardvark.com/2011/11/17/14000-abandoned-wind-turbines-in-the-usa/
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

LIS

Li-S Energy the latest microcap to pivot to US defence market

LU7

Lithium Universe targets silver boom with breakthrough solar recycling tech

ASX Market Close: Why are we red today? Because US CPI's at 3%

LDX

Lumos Diagnostics surges 140% on major US contract deal

First 58 Last

SPONSORED BY