CRP chatham rock phosphate limited

Ann: GENERAL: CRP: Chatham reduces marine area and updates consent process

  1. lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    • Release Date: 05/08/14 08:30
    • Summary: GENERAL: CRP: Chatham reduces marine area and updates consent process
    • Price Sensitive: No
    • Download Document  4.21KB
    					CRP
    05/08/2014 08:30
    GENERAL
    
    REL: 0830 HRS Chatham Rock Phosphate Limited
    
    GENERAL: CRP: Chatham reduces marine area and updates consent process
    
    Media Release
    Reduction in Marine Application Area and Update on Marine Consent Process
    
    5 August 2014
    Chatham Rock Phopshate (CRP or the Company) announces that it has advised the
    Environmental Protection Authority that it will remove the eastern end of
    application area covered by prospecting permit 55967, comprising 4,985 km2
    and representing about half the total, so the area for which marine consent
    is being applied now totals 5,207 km2.
    "Reducing the size of the Company's application area will have no impact on
    CRP's mining plans for the first 15 years, which is covered by its approved
    mining permit and is subject only to a marine consent," Managing Director
    Chris Castle said.
    "It just removes areas covered by a prospecting permit application. However,
    it will simplify questions from the EPA and submitters because it means no
    seabed mining is being proposed by CRP on this part of the Chatham Rise.  The
    Company will only consider mining in that area once more assessment has been
    carried out."
    CRP is currently finalising its responses to the requests by the decision
    making committee (DMC) for further information.  These requests, dated 9
    June, 17 and 25 July and which are a normal part of the process, are wide
    ranging and some have required CRP to commission new research and reports. In
    order to incorporate this new information as well as the impact of the
    reduction in application area, CRP has been granted an extension to the
    timetable for its responses to the EPA, which were due to be submitted this
    week, and now has until 25 August to submit its evidence.
    The scope of the questions includes more detail on the benefits of the
    project to New Zealand and the Chatham Islands, commercial viability, effects
    on commercial fishing, migrating eels, benthic fauna, fish spawning, sediment
    chemistry and trophic modelling, toxicity thresholds, trace elements,
    habitats and seabirds, noise, ocean currents and phosphate prices.
    CRP says the changes will not impact on the expected end date of the
    decision-making timeframe or its proposed mining plan.
    "We do not believe the additional time involved in preparing responses and
    evidence will impact on the decision-making timeframes. Our advice is that a
    decision on the application is still manageable by the end of November."
    Mr Castle said the CRP team is focused on providing accurate and considered
    information in response to the requests from the decision-making committee
    (DMC).
    "We think taking the extra time now is really positive because it helps
    clarify questions at an earlier stage and will enable more efficient use of
    time later in the process. A stitch in time saves nine, as they say."
    "CRP wants to ensure the final package available to the DMC and submitters
    contains the most up-to-date information before the process advances.  We
    also want to make sure everyone understands the scope of the application area
    so this can be addressed in evidence and answers to the information requests.
    
    "We think this approach will benefit all parties.  It's consistent with the
    interests of the community in being able to achieve an adequate assessment of
    potential effects of CRP's proposal.
    "Also importantly we think the additional time invested now in providing more
    detailed information and greater clarity about the application area will
    ultimately allow both the pre-hearing preparation process and the hearing
    itself to be conducted as efficiently as possible.
    "In that respect, we expect the additional time taken now will require
    reduced hearing time, particularly as only 75 of those who made submissions
    wish to be heard, compared with 2,175 in respect of Trans Tasman Resources."
    
    CRP has also asked for the time extension will also apply to the EPA's staff
    report, which the DMC is currently considering.
    "We think the EPA's report will offer greater assistance to the DMC once it
    takes into account the responses provided to the requests for further
    information."
    
    Please note Chris Castle is currently in London.  For further information
    contact him on email [email protected] or mobile +64 21 558 185
    End CA:00253466 For:CRP    Type:GENERAL    Time:2014-08-05 08:30:05
    				
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.