Shorten admits he was the rape suspect!, page-102

This is a political forum and so it isn't surprising to see political points being sharpened and launched.

However the matter was a criminal investigation and the police diligently assembled a brief of evidence.

Are there any allegations of political interference in this police investigation?

In the absence any evidence presented to that effect on this forum, I suggest the police investigation was appropriately proper, competent and thorough.

The brief of evidence was presented to the public prosecutor for evaluation. That evaluation has determined that Mr Shorten does not have a case to answer.

There the matter will rest unless someone brings additional evidence for investigation or unless there is evidence of improper conduct on the part of either the police or the prosecutor.

Is there anyone among the babbling rabble on this forum with any evidence to present?

If so, lets see that evidence presented to the police.

If not, SHUT UP.