Ann: Feasibility Agreement, page-9

Just some thoughts on the recently published paper by POC1 and how it is related here. Assuming of course, this is who we think it is...This global healthcare company "POC1" has a team that appear to be IMO, quite the world-class experts in coupling protein to magnetic nanoparticles. Their recent findings are very eye opening to many of the disadvantages of the fundamental “glue” they use as the foundation of this device. The researchers are very bullishly seeking out to improve the quality, and there is enormous room for improvement! They lust for a better way of doing things. A method that doesn't destroy 98.6-100% of antibodies after 10 years of optimisation. Reading this article gives me the overall feeling that they would be salivating all over our technology, if it were theirs to play with.

I’m rambling. Point being... that if there was any group of researchers in the world who would understand the merits of our technology, it is this group, working on this particular device. It is not by chance that these leaders in the field chose our tech, and they clearly see the potential. They have already performed a head-to-head comparison of their glue vs ours. And now we have a 2nd agreement to expand our inclusion into even more parts of the system. Our situation, which appeared to be dangling by a thread, has completely inverted. I can see us trumping the conventional assay before xmas is upon us.

All IMO, dyor.