IPCC peer review process, page-7

Watch the interview. Her words not mine. i am not a climatologist.
I am glad you guy's googled her up.
I don't think out of the whole 54 minute interview she questioned the science.
What she did do was question the integrity of the IPCC.
For me that was plainly obvious. And what an amazing job she did.
i cannot be bothered mentioning all the stuff she talked about. But it was impressive. Again she did not question the science. She questioned the IPCC and it's credential's from many different aspects. There was no science behind it. Just fact checking.

SO you are welcome to ridicule her as much as you like. All it does is enhance what she was saying.