In what way? You were claiming some sort of authority for WUWT based on their "best science blog" awards, and I'm pointing out that those awards don't actually mean Jack when it comes to scientific merit. Science is not a popularity contest, and facts are not chosen by a democratic vote. The only thing that counts in the end is how well they stack up against the real world - and an unbiased survey of WUWT's predictions and claims shows an abysmal record on that front.
