Hi invest4it,
Thanks for a sensible post! I have few questions though that dawned on me when I read your post.
Lets assume SMM win (i.e. their LOI was cancelled wrongfully) and that the landowners will never allow SMM on their land to mine it (which most of us, including the guys from RCR, believe is the case).
- What does that mean for the LOI that was awarded to AVQ?
- How can SMM then "legally" have their LOI cancelled, or how should that have been done?
- Can a LOI actually be cancelled?
- Does cancelling a LOI (if possible) lead to a re-tender to all parties?
- How long (i.e. years) will it take until AVQ will finally be permitted to mine the land if we have to go through the motion of cancellation, re-award, etc?
I fully agree that AVQ haven't done anything wrong and that they (we actually) are unfortunate to be stuck in this situation, which is really between SMM and the SI government. But what does that mean for us if the judge rules in SMM's favour?
I am not trying to be smug here! I really would like to have some sensible answers to that? Anyone?
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AVQ
- possible court outcomes
possible court outcomes, page-25
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 157 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVQ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online