Happy monday morning to you, squire. Just a quick correction to your statement of facts. "Obviously the previous approach was a waste of time and fell on deaf ears on possible suitors." This would be classed as conjecture unless you know more information from all possible suitors.
Ripper outcomes from the new optimisation. 3.25 - 4.5 vs 7.8 yrs!
Assay results ann due, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
