Ann: Shareholder Presentation, page-32

I’m as excited as the rest of us about the idea of a third project (not including FL) coming soon, but eventually they may want to think about just how far ahead of themselves they want to get WRT the number of projects at hand. Shouldn’t they try proving the success of one project before pursuing too many others? As an exaggerated example, what if come 2018 we have ten projects in the pipeline, but we are struggling to get the pilot Magnolia plant performing as intended?
I know that LNG views their own position as greatly de-risked, and that the plant performance of Magnolia is the responsibility and risk of the EPC contractor, but it still wouldn’t be a good look if our first project is in trouble of any kind and we have many more projects in the making.
I suppose this thought leads to the question: How many projects is enough for now?