cure for cancer...you can invest, page-127

  1. 184 Posts.
    Kat, there are over 200 types of cancer. I am not aware of anyone in here stating that it cures ALL cancers. The fact that it has CURED 75% of treated CANCERS, is backed by very RESPECTED organisations such as QIMR, UQ and last but not least, the holy grail the FDA, and is published for peer review for all to see, doesn't mean anything? The title is what it is, it is a cure for cancer (in a massive 75% of treated cases), and you can invest. Most of us in here are past the age of having a gripe with a headline. If you research “headline” you’ll find something along the lines of getting the maximum amount of info and attention grabbing across with the least amount of words. The body of the article is where the more accurate descriptions are found. But I’m sure you’ve read what’s in here yeah? There’s been plenty of links and information provided.

    The fact that you believe that it cures all cancers from the title, without doing minimum due diligence by actually reading what’s been presented here and researching it, is humorous. You have clearly demonstrated that here. Otherwise you would be talking about how exciting the pre-clinical results are that EBC-46 works significantly better in vivo than in vitro.

    Are you really of the belief that a scam drug would ever get FDA approval for human trials? Do you not think that there are EXTENSIVE checks that are required to be undertaken to test anything on humans? Are you saying that the leading drug authority in the world, are stupid enough to be scammed by a tiny Aussie biotech? Are you saying highly respected cancers researchers not affiliated with the company but are working with the drug and are amazed by it are stupid enough to be scammed? Are you saying respected journalists and vets in Australia who have seen the drug in action are stupid enough to be scammed by this company?

    Your argument is RIDICULOUS.


    You have not done any research into this company. You have not read the published pre-clinical data. You do not believe that QIMR is a respectable company. You believe the FDA are morons. You have not offered anything of value to this thread or offered any evidence supporting your views. All you have provided is off the cuff remarks that it is a scam and you keep referring to your “25 years of investing” experience. In all your years you have not learnt to research a stock before calling it a scam? Do you research anything before making a definitive judgement on it? Seems to me there are some deficiencies here that would be expected as a minimum from someone of “25 years of investing” experience.


    All you’ve offered are a few stupidly worthless colloquialisms such as “it’s a scam”, “I wouldn’t even invest monopoly money in it” and “in my 25 years of investing”. I’ve offered facts and presented the information for you to look into. You have clearly not read any of it and still insist it is a “scam”. My rebellious adolescent teenager is less stubborn.
    Last edited by SilverSpoon: 10/10/14
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.