Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Global Warming, page-180

First 180 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Gneissic

705 Posts.

21/10/14

13:48

Post #: 14156075
Share

Originally posted by ferronium ↑

They are two papers, 1997 & 2012. You claimed the later paper (up to 2011 data) lacked credibility because it had not been peer reviewed (by Warmists?). I went back to the original to show that it had scientific rigor. More so because it included comment that further analysis and confirmation was required (unlike some Warmist papers that claim to be the final word on the matter). The later update paper, also based on the principle of only using geologically stable stations, extended the data set up to 2011, and found the same result. So don't accuse me of fudging the facts just because the findings of a particular study don't fit YOUR EXPECTATION.

When the IPCC publishes a graph showing 7 (or whatever number) different global warming projections then at least 6 must be wrong. Would you favour the one that showed the greatest warming and accuse the others of fabricating their graphs?

Expand

Two papers now are there?

No mention of this mystery second paper in your earlier post and no link to the mystery paper in this post either.

Unless you can substantiate your claim, all my earlier comments stand.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

Week 29 Wrap: ASX hits new all time high of 8,766pts ahead of Aug 1

PTX

This rare type of lymphoma ruins the body – so do existing treatments. Prescient could have a solution

PSC

Prospect's Mumbezhi Project puts it at the middle of copper's megatrend. And FQM just bought in

ASX Market Open: Oz traders follow Week 29 highs with Monday pullback | July 21

First 180 Last