Here something i draw up from TON JORC.
MNS currently Assumption which i think we had the closed figure from previous post.
Based on C, D, F. (3 blocks out of 7)
I model up based on cutoff 5%, also with MNS considuring the minium concentration percentage of 6% from range (6-12%) as insurance.
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 0 5% CutOff 1 2 MNS Graphite Contain Depth Jumbo Distribution (~180umm) Jumbo Mt MOU Served Yr MOU MOU Tickoff 3 55@6% 3.3Mt 46-64m 45% 1.415 200000tpa 7 4 115@6% 6.9Mt 46-64m 45% 3.1 200000tpa 15 Yes 5 55@6% 19.8Mt 400m 45% 8.91 200000tpa 44.5 Yes 6 115@6% 41.4Mt 400m 45% 18.63 200000tpa 93.15 Yes 7 8 TON Graphite Contain Depth Jumbo Distribution (~180umm) Jumbo Mt MOU Assumption 9 1124@11% 20Mt 46-64m 23% 4.6 200000tpa 23 10 1124@11% 123.64Mt 400m 23% 28.4 200000tpa 142
conclusion, we surely tick this MOU off.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- MNS Vs TON
MNS Vs TON, page-68
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 80 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online