It looks like there is inverse relationship between grade and flake size. The company pursued jorc in block d last year. But the company didn't proceed because the grade was 3 to 4 percent on average. I asked the company why block d was targeted. Geologists recommended block d as it displayed larger flake visually. I believe core samples from block d will be retested metallurgically as per new method set up by Frank Houllis. The resource in block d would be considered as a good asset once the test results come out exceptionally good.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- MNS Vs TON
MNS Vs TON, page-143
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable