LOM 0.00% 6.7¢ lucapa diamond company limited

all it takes, page-59

  1. 10,491 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2084
    What the?
    A certain person goes from being informative without the rudeness to flying off the handle without justification.

    In regards to the kimberlites,they are not finding many diamonds because of how deep the RVK is and until they get below the RVK we will not know the extent of any diamonds.
    Lulo is clearly different,so a different process has to be done to identify diamonds in the kimberlites.
    The way these kimberlites erupted at lulo appears to be different to the norm,many large type 2a diamonds are being recovered in the alluvials yet little is being found around and in the kimberlites during this early stage of testing.
    So where did these diamonds weather from?
    Or did most of the diamonds actually weather from a pipe or pipes in the first place?
    I believe a rare event happened at lulo where's during the initial eruptions large rare type 2a diamonds were created above the pipes in the air through the mixture of air and material under very high pressure,these rare diamonds then fell back to the ground mixing in the upper layer of RVK that latter weathered away into the high concentrated mineral indicators being found.
    If this rare event happened,it would explain why these kimberlites will need a different approach due to a heavy layer of RVK and different diamond spread than your conventional kimberlite.
  2. This thread is closed.

    You may not reply to this discussion at this time.

 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add LOM (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.