Post-AGM views, page-79

  1. 2,755 Posts.
    Pup
    Don't mind your views as I can see they are backed with industry knowledge. On using the gravity jigs because its wet screening without the concentrator on line would mean the sulphide and under 1 mm fractions of native copper that can be floated would have to then be diverted to tailings at a modification cost and obvious loss of recovery so it wouldn't be a option in my opinion.

    Unsure if you can say a third of the costs of the MURLF would of been cheaper than going it alone considering ones a balloon loop and ones a 1200 metre siding. There are still options of third party rail load out facilities in the area. Ostigics, Copperchem and possibly Osborne which is a hundred k in the wrong direction by still possibly cheaper, sure all three wouldn't mind the revenue.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.